What's your idea for improving the WunderMap?

Animations with low number of frames are slow; focus should be frames per second so i can perceive motion and quickly note trends

for example, show satellite over past 2 hours. it will take 20+ seconds and you will only get 3-4 frames. to watch the animation 4 times will take 2 minutes. frame rates vary between different products but you could adjust speed of animation based on how many frames are present

1 vote
Vote
Sign in
Signed in as (Sign out)
You have left! (?) (thinking…)
emoduloremodulor shared this idea  ·   ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

3 comments

Sign in
Signed in as (Sign out)
Submitting...
  • KFLLONGW11KFLLONGW11 commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

    i wish the radar image interval between each image was 1 minute upades instead of 6 minutes which is what yours is at/default..would be so much smoother and better to watch if the image updates in animation were a minute or two rather than a gap of 6 minutes, have been wanting this for years.

  • Matt SchaeferAdminMatt Schaefer (User Interaction Lead, Weather Underground) commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

    Thanks, emodulor.

    Are the faster speeds on the speed control list not sufficiently speedy? The key challenge with frames-per-time-period as a measure is that each layer has different time intervals between "frames", e.g., radar, sat, weather stations, and the new temperature map image all have different intervals between data. What does it mean then, if you have multiple layers on and running at a rate of 2 frames a second?

Feedback and Knowledge Base